Therefore, When the intent to cause injury is proven and it's further proven that in the ordinary course of nature, that injury would bring about death, that matter has become objective as well as the intention to get rid of (the main factor that must
93 . Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi Coming towards the main case, it is also a effectively-established proposition of regulation that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to achieve a finding of fact or conclusion. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of a fact or evidence during the Stricto-Sensu, implement to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and conclusion receive support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty of the charge, however, that is topic to the procedure provided under the relevant rules and never otherwise, with the reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not work as appellate authority to re-respect the evidence and to reach at its independent findings to the evidence.
When the state court hearing the case reviews the regulation, he finds that, although it mentions large multi-tenant properties in certain context, it's actually pretty obscure about whether the ninety-working day provision applies to all landlords. The judge, based over the specific circumstances of Stacy’s case, decides that all landlords are held on the ninety-day notice prerequisite, and rules in Stacy’s favor.
competent authority and if any appeal or representation is filed the same shall be decided(Promotion)
The stated recovery can be used, on the most, for corroboration of the main evidence, but by itself it cannot be considered a basis for conviction. They further submitted that the petitioners Bhoora and Mst. Mubeena Bibi also pointed out the place of prevalence. The said memo of pointation is irrelevant and inadmissible as very little was discovered as a result of these pointation. The place of incidence together with the place of throwing the dead body were already while in the knowledge of witnesses previous to their pointation via the petitioners. Reliance is additionally placed on case legislation titled as “Ijaz Ahmad and Another v. The State” (1997 SCMR 1279) wherein it's been held via the august Supreme Court of Pakistan as under:
Matter:-SERVICE Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-225471 Tag:Coming to the main case, It is usually a effectively-founded proposition of law that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to succeed in a finding of fact or conclusion. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of the fact or evidence within the Stricto-Sensu, implement to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and summary acquire support therefrom, the disciplinary authority more info is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty of your charge, however, that is issue towards the procedure provided under the relevant rules rather than otherwise, with the reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not act as appellate authority to re-recognize the evidence and to reach at its independent findings to the evidence.
The reason for this difference is that these civil law jurisdictions adhere to a tradition that the reader should have the ability to deduce the logic from the decision as well as the statutes.[4]
This guide provides useful insights into free online resources offering access to Pakistani case regulation, helping you navigate the complexities of legal research.
The Court directed the Chief Secretary of Sindh to make sure the Act's effective implementation in line with its initial purpose and called for educational programs Bachelor diploma(s) in the subject of cooperative societies. Read more
This case has long been cited in many subsequent judgments, particularly in cases involving constitutional law, judicial independence, along with the rule of regulation.
Finally, a significant contribution of this case which was accepted for consideration because of the Court under Article 184 (three), has actually been setting a precedent which allows for much easier access to the public to method the superior courts and also the subordinate courts on environment related issues.
this Court is still left with no option but to direct the respondents to notify the promotion of your petitioner in next rank .(Promotion)
Section 489-F on the Pakistan Penal Code pertains to offenses involving copyright currency notes and cash. Its primary objective will be to control counterfeiting activities and maintain the sanctity from the national currency.
The decision further directed the government of Pakistan to determine a commission of internationally known and identified researchers to review and rule on future grid station projects. In addition, the Court ordered WAPDA to immediately introduce public consultation and objection procedures for all projects concerning grid stations and power strains.